On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 02:00:01PM +0000, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
Yes, but notice that the name of your "bottom line" changes, rather than being "trunk" all the time. So it still is not compatible with the svn convention.
right, don't worry about the svn convention. it doesn't really concern me.
Mainly I just want the stuff in branches/ out of the way, since it isn't relevant any more.
yes, that makes a lot of sense.
what confused me is that there are branches in two places, and non-branches mixed with branches in Pike.
And I don't see that, because I consider everything in Pike/ to be non-branches.
ok, we are just using different terminology here. as far as i am aware of 'tag' and 'branch' are terms common to most revision control systems. and i use the terms in that sense. (in svn tags appear to be just another convention, whereas in cvs and git tags are really just markers of a given state. (what happens if you commit a change to a tag in svn? will that change the tag?)
greetings, martin.