I don't know what that does. (I've never wanted to compile a separate module.) I'm not claiming the problem isn't solved already. :-)
How about a separate installation tree, like site-lisp (site-pike?), that doesn't get erased with installing new pike revisions?
/ Mirar
Previous text:
2003-01-26 19:39: Subject: Re: Bz2
I think the start should be to make an easy way of building and installing third party modules, for instance with simple tools and pre-made "aclocal.m4" macros.
Doesn't `pike -x module' make it fairly easy already? What's missing?
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)