Re: Promises in Pike vs other languages

Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:

...

...

I mean the fact that you have to have a ; after } where } define a function in functions (well, that's not really why, but it's where it shows up).

...

Just committed a "fix" for that.

I see that Grubba committed a different fix instead. Maybe you already considered it: but lambda definitions of course are and remain expressions. I hope that this fix doesn't mess that up.

I see that the final fix is in. And I'm pleased to see that at least my original fix wasn't completely off the mark.

Well, I guess, this one was/is for you Per, Rest In Peace.

P.S. is the pike-devel gateway still working in both directions? I get the distinct impression that it's just one-way again.