Le mercredi, 29 jan 2003, à 17:45 Europe/Paris, Alexander Demenshin a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 05:40:07PM +0100, Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum wrote:
1, 2 and 3 is still vital then. MPL.
Sorry?
- If PCRE is embedded in any software that is released under the GNU
General Purpose Licence (GPL), or Lesser General Purpose Licence (LGPL), then the terms of that licence shall supersede any condition above with
=============================================================which it is incompatible.
The GPL/LGPL shall supersede, or did I get it wrong? Pike is distributed under GPL/LGPL, as I know.
Does this licensing issues are *really* a problem to add some code that can run with PCRE ?
It can for distributing binaries, but about sources distribution, I don't think so....
And after all if it anoy us to distribute pike with PCRE distribution, then --without-pcre will fix that...
/Xavier
-- Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects O ascii ribbon campaign against html email |\ and Microsoft attachments