17 Jun
2003
17 Jun
'03
1:55 p.m.
Indeed.
/ David Hedbor
Previous text:
2003-06-17 19:47: Subject: Pike localtime(), threads safe and low level localtime() / localtime_r() ?
Nope. The only benefit would be protecting it from non pike threads (thus not holding the interpreter lock) using localtime at the same time. A rather questionable benefit though, since _those_ threads should really be using localtime_r anyway.
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)