4 May
2004
4 May
'04
4:30 p.m.
Yes, and that's not the only thing I find peculiar. It's also peculiar that a dependency error(?) causes an invalid dump to be written at all, as seems to be the case in 9377727. Looks like there's a misguided catch or similar somewhere.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2002-11-26 16:39: Subject: Image.SSL?
I'm not talking about "private modules", I'm talking about the distribution.
Btw, it seems a little odd that dumping order should be relevant to whether a module that _refers itself_ can be dumped or not. Anybody else who finds this peculiar?
/ Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!)