22 Jan
2003
22 Jan
'03
8 p.m.
It'd be even better to make the new zero type not equal to zero and add a new constant nil or null or NULL for it. An uninitialized() function wouldn't be necessary.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2003-01-23 01:46: Subject: Re: zero_type() & UNDEFINED and _typeof()
It's just a compatibility problem, but I agree that your solution is the most preferable one (presented so far).
/ Martin Nilsson (Åskblod)