o Protocols.POP3.client (pike made) o Protocols.SMTP.server (pike made) (that can be used as Protocols.LMTP.server as well). o PCRE module (C made) o OpenSSL module
I wouldn't mind that, I think. If there will be a new module repository, I'm sure several modules already in the Pike tree would be split away from the main branch anyway (Image, for instance).
o Mhash module
What's that? Is it something that belongs under Crypto?
/ Mirar
Previous text:
2003-01-26 01:45: Subject: Re: Bz2
Le dimanche, 26 jan 2003, à 01:25 Europe/Paris, Martin Nilsson (Åskblod) @ Pike (-) developers forum a écrit :
I don't really know why we have kept the Ssleay module. I doubt it even works.
For me it segfault.... on FreeBSD. I can add a pikefarm target for you if you'd like..
What's wrong with the SSL module, or more to the point, what is better with OpenSSL?
The OpenSSL module that is in the Pexts was submitted in pike@roxen.com ml. It is just a wrapper to OpenSSL calls...
So it can be used very easyly with any openssl implementation.
Now, what do we do ? Stopping adding modules ? Making an hypotical CPAN like for Pike, or just throw all work that have been done we some interressed ppl in Pike ?
This is in general the question I am asking to myself when I have sometimes an idea to add some code to pike... (Licensing issue is not for my code a priority since I give all rights to IDA about it).
Here is some code I really like to add in pike :
o Protocols.POP3.client (pike made) o Protocols.SMTP.server (pike made) (that can be used as Protocols.LMTP.server as well). o PCRE module (C made) o OpenSSL module o Mhash module
/Xavier
/ Martin Nilsson (Åskblod)
Previous text:
2003-01-26 01:03: Subject: Re: Bz2
Le samedi, 25 jan 2003, à 21:24 Europe/Paris, Martin Baehr a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:30:01PM +0100, David Hedbor @ Pike developers forum wrote:
So what was wrong with the bzip2 module that was in Pexts since a few years back, out of curiosity?
the fact that nobody took the code and inserted it into the main repository. i don't think that allowing pexts to be added to pike is enough, those who wrote pext need to take the code actively merge it.
it's not going to happen by itself...
So maybe we (me, david, or grendel since we have rw access to pike ?) can add all of our modules to 7.5 tree ?
The question is : what is the policy about it ?
For example I'd like to add OpenSSL module there is in pexts since it is working better with current openssl (tested only on FreeBSD's integrated SSL...) and the Ssleay module we currently have.
... my 0,02 :p
/Xavier
/ Brevbäraren
/ Brevbäraren