28 Feb
2003
28 Feb
'03
12:55 a.m.
I saw you added experimental configure options for it. I suspect the really big problem would be all the builtin functions that take or return (small) negative integers without having any bignum support in them.
/ Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS
Previous text:
2003-02-27 08:11: Subject: Re: 64 bit ints
No, I don't think you'll be able to find someone willing to rewrite the entire Pike code to facilitate a unsigned int type.
It might be possible to compile Pike using unsigned INT32 as INT_TYPE. Maybe most of the neccesary checks are already there... Hmm. It might not be what one really want, though. :)
/ Mirar