A bit of the problem is that the module tree reference is less complete, in comparison to the chapterized manual, which in addition to the full module reference (organized differently) also contains the chapters explaining as much of the datatypes, syntax and the other things one wants in a language manual as we have scraped together so far.
But perhaps "module tree reference" and "chapterized reference" would be an improvement too.
/ Johan Sundström, Lysator
Previous text:
2003-10-21 17:07: Subject: syntax reference and other docs
hi,
when trying to look something up about pike syntax it occured to me that there is no syntax reference. the chapturized reference manual has some of it, but where do i eg find a complete(!) description of eg inherit. ?
just like the module reference a reference for all keywords would be nice.
besides that, the titles module tree quick reference and complete chapterized reference manual are a bit confusing.
the module tree reference isn't exactly quick but rather complete nowadays, while the features of pike have surpassed the chapterized manual making it incomplete.
i'd suggest to change the titles to:
module tree complete reference, and chapterized reference manual.
/ Brevbäraren