Pretty much the same as 8.1. All three branches (8.0, 8.1, faster_calls). Relative standard deviation removed for readability.
interpreter/automap.pike#efun | 26.3M | 25.5M | 39.0M | interpreter/automap.pike#private | 17.7M | 16.0M | 24.3M | interpreter/automap.pike#public | 17.7M | 16.2M | 24.7M | interpreter/call.pike#efun |169.9M |165.0M |166.2M | interpreter/call.pike#index | 15.0M | 15.2M | 13.8M | interpreter/call.pike#private | 20.8M | 20.3M | 17.5M | interpreter/call.pike#public | 20.8M | 20.0M | 18.2M | interpreter/call_array.pike#efun | 23.0M | 22.3M | 32.8M | interpreter/call_array.pike#private| 15.9M | 15.8M | 13.6M | interpreter/call_array.pike#public | 16.2M | 15.4M | 13.4M | interpreter/map.pike#efun | 35.8M | 39.7M | 35.8M | interpreter/map.pike#private | 15.5M | 15.1M | 22.0M | interpreter/map.pike#public | 15.6M | 15.1M | 21.9M | interpreter/recurse.pike#private | 26.7M | 26.7M | 36.4M | interpreter/recurse.pike#public | 26.7M | 26.4M | 35.8M | interpreter/tailcall.pike#private | 21.1M | 20.4M | 29.7M | interpreter/tailcall.pike#public | 21.2M | 20.3M | 29.5M |
Arne
On 11/22/17 22:49, Martin Nilsson (Coppermist) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
How does it compare against 8.0?