Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3041 discussions

pcvs2git.pike
by Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 14 Mar '10

14 Mar '10

I just tried converting Roxen 2.4: Stage Memory use Commits --------------------------------------- Import 339 MB ~17000 Raking 359 MB ~17000 Verify 361 MB ~17000 Merging 662 MB 11886 Graphing 803 MB 10897 Generate 803 MB 10897 I believe that the memory use can be reduced by using more custom datatypes (currently there are a lot of mappings generated in the merging and graphing stages). Another way to reduce the memory use is to partition the graphs in the time axis.

5 58

MIME.StringRange vs. String.Range
by Stephen R. van den Berg 11 Mar '10

11 Mar '10

The MIME.StringRange object seems to be useful in more cases than just in the MIME module. Any objections if we move it into the String module and then name it Range (i.e. String.Range) instead? -- Stephen. Time is nature's way of making sure everything doesn't happen at once.

5 7

7.8.406 alpha
by Peter Bortas ＠ Pike developers forum 11 Mar '10

11 Mar '10

New build: http://pike.ida.liu.se/download/pub/pike/alpha/7.8.406/ No windows build avilable.

5 17

Hi All, , , I get a lot of 'Cannot access global variables in destructed object' errors when rebooting Roxen. It looks as though a function call is completed even after the object is destructed. I only get the error when setting (private) class members of an object. The rest of the functions seems to execute without problem., , Is there any way to prevent this? Like either not execute the function if the object is (going to be) destructed or not destruct an instance until the function has completed?, , Than
by Coen Schalkwijk 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Hi All, I get a lot of 'Cannot access global variables in destructed object' errors when rebooting Roxen. It looks as though a function call is completed even after the object is destructed. I only get the error when setting (private) class members of an object. The rest of the functions seems to execute without problem. Is there any way to prevent this? Like either not execute the function if the object is (going to be) destructed or not destruct an instance until the function has completed? Thanks in advance!* * -- Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards / mit besten Grüßen, Coen Schalkwijk Software Engineer coen.schalkwijk(a)rtl.nl <mailto:coen.schalkwijk@rtl.nl> coen(a)rtlinteractief.nl <mailto:coen@rtlinteractief.nl> +31 (0)35 671 8915

1 0

08 Mar '10

1 0

Re: Feedback (Re: pcvs2git.pike)
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 01 Mar '10

01 Mar '10

In svn, a change in a keyword value does not count as a change; the file does not indicate as modified and the result of "svn diff" is empty.

4 7

port.c does not work in CONFIGURE_TEST mode?
by Stephen R. van den Berg 01 Mar '10

01 Mar '10

On eureka-git.lysator.liu.se: --------------------- $ make configure [...] checking if union initialization works... yes checking if port.c works in CONFIGURE_TEST mode... no configure: error: port.c does not work in CONFIGURE_TEST mode. This is an internal problem in Pike. configure aborted since further configure tests will be unreliable. gmake: *** [configure] Error 1 --------------------- Is this a known issue? Any suggestions? -- Sincerely, Stephen R. van den Berg. I'm NaN.

2 2

pike-git.lysator.liu.se unreachable?
by Stephen R. van den Berg 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

Is there a good reason why pike-git.lysator.liu.se is unreachable? -- Sincerely, Stephen R. van den Berg. A: Because it messes up the order you normally read text in. Q: Why is top-reply so bad? A: Top-reply. Q: What is the most annoying thing in E-mail?

2 1

Re: Testsuite failures (Re: Gz.FIXED and Windows build)
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 21 Feb '10

21 Feb '10

The OS X manpage for ld mentions a "-macosx_version_min" option, are we correctly applying that one? I'm assuming it needs to match the number used for __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__ for things to work out as intended.

2 2

SO_REUSEADDR after an accept()?
by Stephen R. van den Berg 21 Feb '10

21 Feb '10

Why are we setting SO_REUSEADDR on a filedescriptor/socket that came from an accept()? (in socket.c) IMO that seems useless. For a socket used in a bind(), it makes sense, but not for anything else. Any insights? (Henrik? You touched that piece of code last). -- Sincerely, Stephen R. van den Berg. A sign seen in a jewelry store window: "Ears pierced while you wait"

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel