Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3041 discussions

7.8.700 feedback
by Bill Welliver 26 Aug '12

26 Aug '12

Does anyone have any feedback on 7.8.700? So far things look good on the systems I've tried it on. If I don't hear about any show-stoppers, I'll declare success on Friday. Best, Bill

4 3

New Pike beta: 7.8.700
by Bill Welliver 15 Aug '12

15 Aug '12

In light of the recent problems compiling Pike on NT, I've prepared a new release of 7.8 that hopefully resolves this problem. http://pike.ida.liu.se/download/pub/pike/beta/7.8.700/ As always, please feel free to download and report any problems. Bill

5 5

Re: New 7.8 release candidate: 7.8.696
by Tobias S. Josefowitz 07 Aug '12

07 Aug '12

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum <10353(a)lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > Should anything listen on port 80? pike-git is just for the git > repositories so it should listen on port 9418 for anonymous access and > port 22 for authenticated access, yes? For the general picture, no clue. But the http://pike-git.lysator.liu.se/pike-overlay.xml mentioned at https://github.com/pikelang/pike-overlay and on the pike forum a long time ago used to be retrievable.

1 0

Re: New 7.8 release candidate: 7.8.696
by Tobias S. Josefowitz 07 Aug '12

07 Aug '12

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum <10353(a)lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > Great. I've now added a corresponding ebuild to the pike overlay for Gentoo. While trying to get http://pike-git.lysator.liu.se/pike-overlay.xml I noticed that currently nothing seems to listen on port 80. Tobi

2 1

possible blocker in 7.8.696
by H. William Welliver III 06 Aug '12

06 Aug '12

I was doing some testing of external modules last week and was having problems. At the time I chalked it up to being a corrupt build environment, but now I'm not so sure: The problem is that installation of an external module happens only after a successful verification, and it appears that the verify target is broken when using pike -x module. It's possible that this has been broken for a long time in 7.8, as 7.8.352 also has the same problem. Basically, in 7.6, verify called $(RUNPIKE), which was passed in by the external pike process. In 7.8 (specifically commit 385f54c91 by mast back in 2006 (!)), that's changed to $(FINAL_PIKE), which isn't, and it gets generated using the pike in the original build directory. I'm just not sure how to best fix the problem. Probably the best approach would be to modify pike -x module to also pass FINAL_PIKE with the same value. Honestly, I don't know how this got past me for so long. Any thoughts? Bill

3 3

Re: Packagers?
by Lance Dillon 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

i could create rpms...do we a spec file already, or should i use one of the ones i have already (or create a new one if the other ones arent suitable )? Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android

2 1

Packagers?
by Bill Welliver 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

Do we have anyone handling Debian packages, or RPMs or the like? I know Grubba does an ebuild but was wondering if there are any others that need to be prepared for a new release? Bill

2 1

New 7.8 release candidate: 7.8.696
by Bill Welliver 31 Jul '12

31 Jul '12

Hello all, I've prepared a new stable release candidate (beta) for everyone's building pleasure. 7.8.696 may be downloaded from: http://pike.ida.liu.se/download/pub/pike/beta/7.8.696/ Please feel free to try it out and please do report back on any success or failures. Best, Bill

5 10

Re: New 7.8 release candidate: 7.8.696
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 31 Jul '12

31 Jul '12

Well, I've uploaded a binary release for Solaris 11 64-bit (should run on OI too), with a working Gettext module. Both libintl and libiconv seems to be the GNU versions (from OpenCSW).

2 7

Pike 7.9
by Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 30 Jul '12

30 Jul '12

I was looking through the testsuite failures in 7.9. I think that these two are the only two regressions (and possibly the type system ones as well, but that could also be due to grubbas tweaking). int gnu (mixed... args) {}; gnu(@indices (all_constants()), gauge { foreach (({1,2,3}), int j) do if (j && gnu(@indices (all_constants()), 17 + gauge {break;})) return 0; while (0); }); #pragma strict_types void x (void|mapping(string:string) args) { if (args) foreach (indices (args), string a) werror ("%O\n", a); }

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel