Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3 participants
3048 discussions

Release time
by Johan Sundstr�m (folksk�dare) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Apr '03

03 Apr '03

Still two checkins in 7.4 unaccounted for in CHANGES: http://pike.ida.liu.se/development/cvs/pike.xml?v=7.4&build=217&between=200… grubba?

2 2

... and thanks for all the fish
by Martin Baehr 03 Apr '03

03 Apr '03

enough is enough! i've had it! with pike: calendar failing, floatingpoint bugs, blocking i/o callbacks upgrading woes with caudium: php problems parser bugs entity problems licensing problems camas problems with roxen: mysql dependancy complex rxml classes with sTeam: confusing web interface problems with access to pike lack of good search facility complicated irc access complex xslt for webpages. supports to many protocols time to switch! to python: negative indices in arrays clear indenting syntax no more braces and brakets to apache: excellent php support no more rxml bussinessfriendly license plenty of webmailers to choose from to zope: cool leaders (hi paul) instant and easy websites. large user community. it was a fun ride and i enjoyed working with all of you, but now it's time to move on. greetings, martin. -- interested in doing python programming, zope/python training, zope/python and/or unix system administration anywhere in the world. -- junior python working in europe csl-gmbh.net programmer zope.org (www.archlab|(www|db).hb2).tuwien.ac.at unix bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at systemadministrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org is.(schon.org|root.at) Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/

8 16

SSL problems
by Alexander Demenshin 01 Apr '03

01 Apr '03

Hi there, I found that there is no way to enforce inquiry of client certificate, for instance. In particular, there is no variable "auth_level" in SSL.context class, but it is used in SSL.handshake. Obvious fix (adding this variable and setting it to AUTHLEVEL_ask) doesn't help much, though - certificate is not requested anyway (not properly, at least). Additional problem - server's request for certificate is not handled at all: "Certificate request not yet implemented." I do something wrong or? :) If not - is it planned to be fixed or it is better to use OpenSSL glue? Regards, /Al

1 0

Pike reference manual
by Martin Nilsson (har bott i google) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 31 Mar '03

31 Mar '03

I've put some effort in the reference manual generation during the last days. The predef namespace is now the default namespace, but the other ones are still available and crosslinks works. If you have any suggestions while I'm at it, now is the time to communicate it...

3 3

Calendar failure
by Johan Sundstr�m (folksk�dare) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 31 Mar '03

31 Mar '03

Interesting. The DST shift seems to do bad things to the Calendar module, or vice versa. Below, I am skeptical to (5), and find (7) onwards a bit odd, though perhaps correct as designed? Pike v7.4 release 13 running Hilfe v3.5 (Incremental Pike Frontend) > Calendar.parse("%Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s %z","2003-03-30 01:00:00 Europe/Stockholm"); (1) Result: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 1:00:00 CET) > Calendar.parse("%Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s %z","2003-03-30 02:00:00 Europe/Stockholm"); (2) Result: 0 > Calendar.parse("%Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s %z","2003-03-30 03:00:00 Europe/Stockholm"); (3) Result: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 3:00:00 CEST) > Calendar.parse("%Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s %z","2003-03-30 22:00:00 Europe/Stockholm"); (4) Result: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 22:00:00 CEST) > Calendar.parse("%Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%s %z","2003-03-30 23:00:00 Europe/Stockholm"); (5) Result: 0 > Calendar.Second(2003,3,30,1,0,0); (6) Result: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 1:00:00 CET) > Calendar.Second(2003,3,30,2,0,0); (7) Result: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 3:00:00 CEST) > Calendar.Second(2003,3,30,3,0,0); (8) Result: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 4:00:00 CEST) > Calendar.Second(2003,3,30,22,0,0); (9) Result: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 23:00:00 CEST) > Calendar.Second(2003,3,30,23,0,0); not in range (second 0..82799 exist) /usr/local/pike/7.4.13/lib/modules/Calendar.pmod/YMD.pmod:871: Day(Sun 30 Mar 2003)->get_unit("second",82800) /usr/local/pike/7.4.13/lib/modules/Calendar.pmod/Time.pmod:128: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 0:00:00 CET sharp)->create_backtry(23,0,0) /usr/local/pike/7.4.13/lib/modules/Calendar.pmod/YMD.pmod:2368: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 0:00:00 CET sharp)->create_backtry(2003,3,30,23,0,0 ) /usr/local/pike/7.4.13/lib/modules/Calendar.pmod/Time.pmod:109: Second(Sun 30 Mar 2003 0:00:00 CET sharp)->create(2003,3,30,23,0,0) object_program(Calendar.ISO): ISO->cSecond() HilfeInput:1: HilfeInput()->___HilfeWrapper() / Johan Sundström (folkskådare) Previous text: >2003-03-30 12:35: >Subject: http://pike.ida.liu.se/development/cvs/pike.xml?between=2003-03-30&and=2003… >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >Jag fick just följande överst på ovanstående sida: > >RXML run error: Illegal time "2003-03-30 23:59:59". > | <emit source="timerange"> > | <define variable="var.navi"> > | <cache flush-on-no-cache="yes" nocache="for date nav"> > | <nocache> > | <cache profile="browser"> > > / Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) >

6 30

Wrong optimization? [again time()]
by Alexander Demenshin 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

Hi there, Just found another bug(?) - the construction like: int ts = time() + 10; while (time() < ts) /* nothing */ ; is wrongly optimized - it doesn't work as expected, i.e. the loop is bypassed - so virtually there is no delay. When I change it to 'while ((n = time()) < ts);' or put something in body, it works. Checked against one day old CVS Pike 7.4 (7.4.17). NB: Is it related to time() only or? :) Regards, /Al

1 0

args
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

What's up with the command line argument parser? | orchid% pike -M ~/pike/lib/modules -D FOO=17 -e 'werror("%O\n",FOO)'; echo | Pike: Couldn't find script to execute | ("/home/mirar/pike/longlongint/FOO=17") | orchid% pike -M ~/pike/lib/modules -DFOO=17 -e 'werror("%O\n",FOO)'; echo | -:3:Undefined identifier "FOO". | Compilation failed.

2 5

array_adapter.h
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 30 Mar '03

30 Mar '03

Temporary fault = checkin miss or am I missing something? make[3]: *** No rule to make target `[...]/src/post_modules/_ADT/array_adapter.h', needed by `adt.o'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `[...]/post_modules/_ADT'

2 2

configure
by Martin Nilsson (har bott i google) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 28 Mar '03

28 Mar '03

configure.in in _math says AC_CHECK_HEADERS(ieeefp.h fp_class.h floatingpoint.h) and later does #ifdef HAVE_FP_CLASS_H #include <fpclass.h> #endif in the test for HAVE_WORKING_FPSETMASK. HAVE_FP_CLASS_H is not used at all in math.c. There is at least one thing wrong here, right?

2 1

%-8F
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 27 Mar '03

27 Mar '03

Is it a conscious choice that %F doesn't honor the minus flag? | > sscanf("\0\0\0\0\x29\xf0\x3c\x41","%8F",x),x; | Result: 0.000000 | > sscanf("\0\0\0\0\x29\xf0\x3c\x41","%-8F",x),x; | Result: 0.000000 | > sscanf(reverse("\0\0\0\0\x29\xf0\x3c\x41"),"%8F",x),x; | Result: 1896489.000000 | > sprintf("%8F",1896489.0); | Result: "A<ð)\0\0\0\0" | > sprintf("%-8F",1896489.0); | Result: "A<ð)\0\0\0\0" It makes it a bit unnecessary difficult to read binary floats produced by Intel machines.

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel