Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3041 discussions

Object comparision in C module
by Alexander Demenshin 05 Feb '04

05 Feb '04

Hi, How to compare two objects which are implemented in C module? What I don't know is how to make sure that other object is of same type. Is it field "subtype", or? Where object type is stored and how it is assigned, BTW? Thanks! Regards, /Al

7 20

Crypto naming
by Niels M�ller (v�ssar r�dpennan) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 04 Feb '04

04 Feb '04

I've browsning some of the code, and have a few comments. I think Crypto.SHA ought to be renamed Crypto.SHA1. The name Crypto.Proxy is somewhat strange (it's actually a buffer). Perhaps it should be renamed, and perhaps it would make sense with a feed/drain interface. Also the pad method looks a little strange, PIKEFUN string pad() { ptrdiff_t i; for (i = THIS->backlog_len; i < THIS->block_size - 1; i++) THIS->backlog[i] = DO_NOT_WARN((unsigned char)(my_rand() & 0xff)); THIS->backlog[THIS->block_size - 1] = DO_NOT_WARN((unsigned char)(7 - THIS->backlog_len)); ^ The constant should probably be something like THIS->block_size - 1.

3 6

nettle
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 04 Feb '04

04 Feb '04

| AC_MSG_ERROR([Cannot compile --with-bignums without the GMP library | It is highly recommended that you install a working GMP | library on your system as that will add features to Pike | required by many applications (such as Roxen). However, | if you know that you do not need GMP, you may re-run configure | with the option --without-bignums instead.]) Considering that Pike now needs Nettle to have at least a semi-usable make verify, maybe adding such a test to configure for Nettle too wouldn't be a bad idea?

4 9

Nettle or no Nettle?
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Feb '04

03 Feb '04

Hm, what's up with this: misao:/space/hack/Pike/7.5/build% ls -l lib/modules/*Nettle* -rw-rw-r-- 1 marcus local 147 Feb 3 22:44 lib/modules/Nettle.pmod -rwxrwxr-x 1 marcus local 92147 Feb 3 22:44 lib/modules/___Nettle.somisao:/space/hack/Pike/7.5/build% ldd lib/modules/___Nettle.so libnettle.so.2 => /usr/lib/libnettle.so.2 (0x6ff97000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0fe80000) libgmp.so.3 => /usr/lib/libgmp.so.3 (0x6ff43000) /lib/ld.so.1 => /lib/ld.so.1 (0x08000000) misao:/space/hack/Pike/7.5/build% grep HAVE_LIBNETTLE post_modules/Nettle/nettle_config.h #define HAVE_LIBNETTLE 1 misao:/space/hack/Pike/7.5/build% make run_hilfe /space/hack/Pike/7.5/build/pike -DNOT_INSTALLED -DPRECOMPILED_SEARCH_MORE -m/space/hack/Pike/7.5/build/master.pike Pike v7.5 release 17 running Hilfe v3.5 (Incremental Pike Frontend) > indices(Nettle); (1) Result: ({ }) >

1 0

mktime
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Feb '04

03 Feb '04

The function my_tm_diff() in buildint_functions.c is bugged. It doesn't differentiate between months of different length, but treats all months as having 30 days, 10 hours and 30 minutes. This means that e.g. the dates 2004-01-31-12:00:00 and 2004-02-01-01:30:00 will be considered _equal_. The recent failures of the testsuite is due to these state of affairs. The bug can be reproduced with mktime(gmtime(1075550400)) The bug is likely to occur with any date being the last day of a month containing 31 days, after 10:30 AM.

3 3

Pike module initialization at compile time
by Alexander Demenshin 03 Feb '04

03 Feb '04

Hi, I asked this once on general Pike list, nobody answered, so I'll try here :) The question is - why create() is called when module is inherited, not when it is instaniated? If there is Parent.pmod (with create() defined), and Child.pmod, which inherits Parent, then create() defined in Parent will be called when Child is _compiled_. Compilation of Parent won't call it's create() method. In case if module is _imported_, such behavior is logical, but when inherited... What especially confuses me is the fact that regular parent class definition won't cause such effect... Any ideas/explanations? :) Is this "behavior by design" or? Regards, /Al

5 18

Re: Default backend and thread backends?
by Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS ＠ Pike developers forum 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

Correction: Thread A might release its read lock after checking that the object is thread local, and then the fact that no other thread can access it is relevant. I don't think it'd be good to make threads keen on releasing the read lock though, since they can't reasonably do any significant amount of work without reading global objects.

1 0

7.6
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

How is the plan for 7.6? Would it be possible to split 7.5 into a 7.7 and a 7.6 and just fix bugs in the 7.6 branch until it can be released? (Just asking. Or nagging... :) )

1 0

mktime
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

| home/xenofarm/xenoclient/pike-7.5/orchid.mirar.org/buildtmp/Pike7.5-2004013…: | Test 6748 (shift 0) (CRNL) failed. | 1: mixed a() { int x=time(); return mktime(localtime(x)) == x;; } | 2: mixed b() { return 1; } | 3: | | Error: Cannot convert. | Unknown program: mktime(12,5,18,31,0,104,0,-3600) | testsuite:1: testsuite()->a() What's with that, and how was it fixed by this: | 2004-02-02 03:02:22 (nilsson) Pike/7.5/src/svalue.c, (+12/-2) (2271 lines) dl | \a and \v is recognized on the input side, so let's format them as | such on the output side as well. ??!?

2 1

A correction to Protocols.HTTP.Server.Port
by Alexander Demenshin 30 Jan '04

30 Jan '04

Hi, During long (and very active) run of simple web server, implemented using standard module, found a problem: Indexing the NULL value with "set_nonblocking". /usr/local/pike/7.4.28/lib/modules/Protocols.pmod/HTTP.pmod/Server.pmod/Request.pike:62: Protocols.HTTP.Server.Request()->attach_fd(0,Protocols.HTTP.Server.Port(),bin/shttpd()->Handler) /usr/local/pike/7.4.28/lib/modules/Protocols.pmod/HTTP.pmod/Server.pmod/Port.pike:56: Protocols.HTTP.Server.Port()->new_connection() The fix is trivial (for 7.4.28; but the problem exists in 7.5.* as well): --- Port.pike~ 2004-01-30 00:45:12.000000000 +0100 +++ Port.pike 2004-01-30 00:45:12.000000000 +0100 @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ static void new_connection() { Stdio.File fd=port->accept(); + + if (!fd) + return; // There is nothing to accept --aldem + Request r=request_program(); r->attach_fd(fd,this_object(),callback); } The reason is unknown - why there is nothing to accept, but I guess it happens under _very_ heavy load (or DoS). Regards, /Al

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel