Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3044 discussions

Pike Conference 2004 query
by hww3 ＠ Pike developers forum 12 Aug '04

12 Aug '04

Greetings! I'm working with Martin Bähr to set up a Pike conference later this year. We had a number of viable options (which was gratifying in itself), and we've narrowed these down to a proposed date and location. We wanted to get some feedback on that to see if there were any big conflicts with anyone out there (obviously, we'd like to have as many folks from IDA as possible, assuming they're interested :)) Right now, we're looking at a conference in Essen, Germany starting somewhere in the first full week of October, the 11th through the 17th. Ideally, the conference would include one or two weekend days so that those who are unable to get time from work would be able to attend. Once we get a date set, we can start working out the details... Any thoughts, comments, suggestions? Bill Welliver (self appointed conference co-chair :))

11 13

Re: killing threads
by Mirar ＠ Pike developers forum 11 Aug '04

11 Aug '04

It might be possible to send an exception to a thread and kill it that way. In many cases it would be enough if the thread got killed on backjumps/functioncalls/whereever other stuff are checked as well... / Mirar Previous text: >2004-08-11 15:35: >Subject: Re: killing threads >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Ken wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In a multi-threaded app, is it possible to kill a thread through means >> other than the starting function returning? > >No, and the reason is that it is nontrivial to clean up the resources held >by the killed thread. > >Hmm... I guess it'd be possible to let check_threads_etc() throw an error >of severity level THROW_THREAD_KILLED. Feel free to experiment. > >> I've tried using the kill() function, but all the signals cause the >> entire app to die. >> >> Thanks for any input! >> >> -Ken > >-- >Henrik Grubbström grubba(a)roxen.com >Roxen Internet Software AB > > > > / Brevbäraren >

3 8

pike -x on local sources
by Bertrand LUPART 10 Aug '04

10 Aug '04

Hey *, I'm following the instructions on http://gotpike.org:8000/ to build Pike modules. While i manage building and installing modules remotely using monger without any problem, i can't figure out how to build and install a module whose sources are local. Quoting http://gotpike.org:8000/PikeModule.html: "When the tool is run from the module source directory, without any arguments, the tool will determine what steps need to be performed in order to build the module." For example, while i try to run "pike -x Public.Protocols.Jabber" from /usr/local/src/Public_Protocols_Jabber-1.0, i end up with "Could not resolv Tools.Standalone.Public.Protocols.Jabber. (Perhaps the installed pike tree has been moved.)" What am i missing? -- Bertrand LUPART Linkeo.com - R&D | http://www.linkeo.com/ +33 1 72 71 71 82 | 17, rue de la Banque - F75002 Paris Systèmes de gestion d'email entrant | Email management systems

3 8

Fail to build Module modref
by Kaos 10 Aug '04

10 Aug '04

Hi, Anyone has any idea why I get this error? kaos@jenna Lua $ pike -x module module_modref make PIKE_INCLUDES=-I/usr/include/pike PIKE_SRC_DIR=/usr/include/pike BUILD_BASE=/usr/include/pike MODULE_BASE=/usr/include/pike TMP_BINDIR=/usr/include/pike SRCDIR=. FULL_SRCDIR=/home/kaos/dev/pike/Lua/ TMP_MODULE_BASE=. PIKE_EXTERNAL_MODULE=pike_external_module CORE_AUTODOC_PATH=/usr/lib/doc/src/core_autodoc.xml SYSTEM_DOC_PATH=/usr/lib/doc/ SYSTEM_MODULE_PATH=/usr/lib/pike/modules LOCAL_MODULE_PATH=$$HOME/lib/pike/modules RUNPIKE=pike module_modref make[1]: Entering directory `/home/kaos/dev/pike/Lua' if test ! -d "./plib/modules" ; then \ mkdir -p ./plib/modules ; \ fi; if test "xlua.o" != "x" ; then \ /usr/include/pike/install_module module.so ./plib/modules/Public.pmod/Lang.pmod/___Lua.so ;\ fi; \ if test "xmodule.pmod.in" != "x"; then \ /usr/include/pike/install_module module.pmod ./plib/modules/Public.pmod/Lang.pmod/Lua.pmod ;\ fi make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kaos/dev/pike/Lua' pike -x extract_autodoc --builddir=plib/refdoc --srcdir=plib/modules Extracting from /home/kaos/dev/pike/Lua/plib/modules/ Extracting from /home/kaos/dev/pike/Lua/plib/modules/Public.pmod/ Extracting from /home/kaos/dev/pike/Lua/plib/modules/Public.pmod/Lang.pmod/ Extracting file "/home/kaos/dev/pike/Lua/plib/modules/Public.pmod/Lang.pmod/Lua.pmod"... if test "Xlua.c" -ne "X"; then \ pike -x extract_autodoc --builddir=plib/refdoc lua.c; \ fi /bin/sh: line 1: test: Xlua.c: integer expression expected pike -x join_autodoc --quiet --post-process "plib/autodoc.xml" "plib/refdoc" make: *** No rule to make target `plib/autodoc.xml', needed by `module_modref.xml'. Stop. kaos@jenna Lua $ test "Xlua.c" -ne "X" -bash: test: Xlua.c: integer expression expected kaos@jenna Lua $ ls AUTHORS Makefile config.cache configure linker_options lua.cmod.compiled modlist_headers module.pmod.in plib CHANGES Makefile.in config.log configure.in lua.c lua.o modlist_segment module.so refdoc COPYING README config.status dependencies lua.cmod make_variables module.pmod pike_Lua.feature testsuite.in I have a lua.c file (generated from lua.cmod) in the current directory, with some Autdoc markup in it. But it seems that it's something with 'test' that gets bogus.. ? // Andreas

4 3

Autodoc
by Kaos 10 Aug '04

10 Aug '04

Hi, I missed two @ signs in the doc for _Charset/module.pmod.in at lines 83 and 94 for the @expr{ ... @} doc elements for the latest 7.7 cvs version during make doc. // Andreas

1 0

Image.Image
by Martin Nilsson (DivX Networks) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 10 Aug '04

10 Aug '04

Is there any reason why Pike should accept a 0*0 image objects (or n*0 or 0*n for that matter)?

7 28

Image.Image
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 09 Aug '04

09 Aug '04

Just change if((X = malloc(a+1)) == NULL) error(); to if(a==0) X = NULL; else if((X = malloc(a)) == NULL) error(); Done.

1 0

Re: Pike Conference 2004 query
by Johan Sundstr�m (Achtung Liebe!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 07 Aug '04

07 Aug '04

Not much, but there is still a decent chance I'll be able to afford it nevertheless. (I just thought I'd respond at all and perhaps happen to inspire others too, which seems to have worked. :-) / Johan Sundström (Achtung Liebe!) Previous text: >2004-08-06 15:59: >Subject: Re: Pike Conference 2004 query >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >Well, what can we do to make you say yes? The venue martin has lined up >might have inexpensive accomodations (as in almost free from what I >understand). > >Bill > >On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Johan Sundström (Achtung Liebe!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote: > >> Mostly costs; available time is mostly somewhat easier to arrange for. >> >> / Johan Sundström (Achtung Liebe!) >> >> Previous text: >> >2004-08-05 17:22: >> >Subject: Re: Pike Conference 2004 query >> >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >that would be sad. >> >what's keeping you? >> >travel cost? >> >time? >> > >> >greetings, martin. >> > >> > >> > / Brevbäraren >> > >> > > > > / Brevbäraren >

1 0

external module building and environment
by Bill Welliver 29 Jul '04

29 Jul '04

I was wondering if anyone knew if there was any rationale behind the behavior of pike -x module with respect to environment variables. The current behavior is for any environment variables that were in effect for the original build process to take precedent over any in the current environment. This means that it's not possible to use CPPFLAGS and the like to help configure find new libraries and headers. Obviously, that's rather inconvenient. Shouldn't it be the other way around? Maybe the behavior should be more sophisticated (ie combine them)? Any thoughts? Bill

2 1

OpenBSD and pike...
by Xavier Beaudouin 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

Hello, According to http://pike.ida.liu.se/generated/pikefarm/7.7/97_28/verifylog.txt We have : Doing tests in modules/files/testsuite (94 tests) 0: ++++++++++ ++++++++++ ++++++++++ ++++++++++ ++++++++++ 50: ++++++++++ ++++++++++ ++++++++++ +++--+++++ Available fds: 1024 Forking... ok. Doing simple tests. Testing dup & assign. / Testing accept. -\|/-\| Testing uni-directional shutdown on socket Testing uni-directional shutdown on pipe Testing 12 sockets. /-\| Testing 16 sockets. /-\| Testing 20 sockets. /-\|/- Testing 24 sockets. \|/-\| Testing 28 sockets. /-\|/-\| Testing 32 sockets. /-\|/-\| Testing 36 sockets. /-\|/-\|/- Testing 40 sockets. \|/-\|/-\| Testing 44 sockets. /-\|/-\|/-\| Testing 48 sockets. /-\Accept returned 0, errno: 9 64 open fds: 0 - 63 [WATCHDOG] Pike testsuite timeout, sending SIGABRT. Abort (core dumped) *** Error code 134 Gdb says (http://pike.ida.liu.se/generated/pikefarm/7.7/97_28/core.txt) : Core was generated by `pike'. Program terminated with signal 6, Abort trap. #0 0x12793dd in poll () Active threads Backtrace #0 0x12793dd in poll () #1 0x7ddfda0 in _thread_kern_poll () #2 0x7ddf746 in _thread_kern_sched () #3 0x7ddf971 in _thread_kern_sched_state () #4 0x7dd9d73 in poll () #5 0x1c112353 in handle_timeouts (ignored=0x0) at /usr/home/kiwi/xenoclient/pike-7.7/obsd.home.oav.net/buildtmp/Pike- v7.7-snapshot/src/modules/HTTPLoop/timeout.c:192 #6 0x7dd703d in _thread_start () #7 0x1f in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffff. This bug is here for ages... for both pike 7.6 and 7.7 (I don't have pike 7.4 on xenofarm even my box is sending data... so I cannot compare... do xenofarm does some "blacklisting ????").. Can I help to fix that ? /Xavier -- Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader. President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/ Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects

5 7

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel