Pike-devel

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

1 participants
3045 discussions

Strong type checking
by cschalkwijk 16 Apr '08

16 Apr '08

Is there a way to force strong type checking with pike (7.4)? It seems that I can pass an int to a method that requires a string and assign an int to a string variable. Coen __________________________________________________________ Deze e-mail en de inhoud is vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent van deze e-mail verzoeken wij u dit direct door te geven aan de verzender door middel van een reply e-mail en de ontvangen e-mail uit uw systemen te verwijderen. Als u geen geadresseerde bent, is het niet toegestaan om kennis te nemen van de inhoud, deze te kopieren, te verspreiden, bekend te maken aan derden noch anderszins te gebruiken. The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please notify us immediately if you have received it in error by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. __________________________________________________________

2 1

utime
by Martin Nilsson (Opera Mini - AFK!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 16 Apr '08

16 Apr '08

There is a #ifdef _UTIMBUF_DEFINED struct _utimbuf b; #else struct utimbuf b; #endif in system.c, but I don't see anything that could define _UTIMBUF_DEFINED.

4 4

Re: Regexp troubles
by bertrand.lupart＠linkeo.com 15 Apr '08

15 Apr '08

Mirar @ Pike developers forum <10353(a)lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > >However, i'd like to know why while doing this: > >----8<----8<----8<----8<---- > >> object r = Regexp.PCRE.Studied("[\\W]*$"); > >> r->replace(foo, ""); > >---->8---->8---->8---->8---- > >Pike eats all my CPU and the command never finish. > > Good question. The PCRE code should be easy to read though, feel free > to investigate? :) I just like other people confirm that's a real bug :) > Sounds like something that should be added to the testsuite, anyway. > Both of the problems... I inadvertendly found out that replace1() succeed where replace() failed: ----8<----8<----8<----8<---- $ pike Pike v7.6 release 112 running Hilfe v3.5 (Incremental Pike Frontend) > string foo = " This is some text \0\0\0"; > object r = Regexp.PCRE.Studied("[\\W]*$"); > r->replace1(foo, ""); (1) Result: " This is some text" ---->8---->8---->8---->8---- Should be a good start to narrow down the problem. -- Bertrand LUPART http://bertrand.gotpike.org/

1 0

Regexp troubles
by cschalkwijk 15 Apr '08

15 Apr '08

(using pike 7.4 r464) I want to replace something at the end of a string, but I can't get it done: I don't know the exact contents of the string when executing code, mind you. string test = "aaa123aaa"; Regex re = Regex("[a]$"); string result = re->replace(test,""); results in: "123b" while I want it to be 'aaa123'. using "^[a]" results in "123aaa". What am I doing wrong? Eventually I want to convert a string like " This is some text \0\0\0" to " This is some text". Greets, Coen __________________________________________________________ Deze e-mail en de inhoud is vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent van deze e-mail verzoeken wij u dit direct door te geven aan de verzender door middel van een reply e-mail en de ontvangen e-mail uit uw systemen te verwijderen. Als u geen geadresseerde bent, is het niet toegestaan om kennis te nemen van de inhoud, deze te kopieren, te verspreiden, bekend te maken aan derden noch anderszins te gebruiken. The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please notify us immediately if you have received it in error by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. __________________________________________________________

4 3

pike-cms?
by Martin B�hr 14 Apr '08

14 Apr '08

hi, anyone noticed this yet? http://code.google.com/p/pike-cms/ might be good to tell those guys that their name and the use of the pike tag is very missleading. greetings, martin.

2 2

pikefarm and code librarian no longer seeing updates from cvs?
by Martin Bähr 08 Apr '08

08 Apr '08

hi, code librarian and pikefarm are not picking up any changes from cvs since this morning. any ideas what could be the issue? greetings, martin.

4 5

Re: [Patch] pike -x
by bertrand.lupart＠linkeo.com 29 Mar '08

29 Mar '08

> I can't say much intelligent about this patch, but it looks like an > improvement. Since noone else has shown any interest I've committed it > to 7.7 so it doesn't get lost in time. Thanks! Thank you. -- Bertrand LUPART http://bertrand.gotpike.org/

1 0

[Patch] pike -x
by bertrand.lupart＠linkeo.com 28 Mar '08

28 Mar '08

Hello, Here's a patch for having a more clear error message and abort if the specs file isn't present at the expected location when running "pike -x monger --install" for example. The current error is actually a user-unfriendly backtrace. Maybe the check for this file could be moved elsewhere, since before checking for the specs file, monger select the good version of the software to install and downloads it. ----8<----8<----8<----8<---- --- Tools.pmod/Standalone.pmod/module.pike.ori 2008-03-18 15:32:11.000000000 +0100 +++ Tools.pmod/Standalone.pmod/module.pike 2008-03-18 15:50:42.000000000 +0100 @@ -194,6 +194,14 @@ int main(int argc, array(string) argv) { + string specspath=include_path+"/specs"; + + if(!Stdio.is_file(specspath)) + { + werror("Missing specs file at %s\n",specspath); + return 1; + } + run_pike = master()->_pike_file_name; #ifdef NOT_INSTALLED run_pike += " -DNOT_INSTALLED"; @@ -205,7 +213,7 @@ run_pike += " -m"+master()->_master_file_name; putenv("RUNPIKE", run_pike); - load_specs(include_path+"/specs"); + load_specs(specspath); foreach(Getopt.find_all_options(argv,aggregate( ({"autoconf",Getopt.NO_ARG,({"--autoconf"}) }), ---->8---->8---->8---->8---- -- Bertrand LUPART http://bertrand.gotpike.org/

2 1

Compiler/interpreter feature request
by cschalkwijk 27 Mar '08

27 Mar '08

I don't know if it's already available (if so: I'd like to know) but I'd like to receive warnings about unused variables/objects/methods in Pike. Is this possible? Next to that: is there any progress with the Pike Eclipse plugin? (What was the url again?) Greetings, Coen __________________________________________________________ Deze e-mail en de inhoud is vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent van deze e-mail verzoeken wij u dit direct door te geven aan de verzender door middel van een reply e-mail en de ontvangen e-mail uit uw systemen te verwijderen. Als u geen geadresseerde bent, is het niet toegestaan om kennis te nemen van de inhoud, deze te kopieren, te verspreiden, bekend te maken aan derden noch anderszins te gebruiken. The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please notify us immediately if you have received it in error by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. __________________________________________________________

3 2

libffi and java-static elements
by H. William Welliver III 25 Mar '08

25 Mar '08

Did I understand correctly that libffi will be a bundle in Pike 7.8? If so, that makes it easier for me to include the Objective-C module directly in Pike. Also, I vaguely recall some additions to 7.7 that seemed to suggest java-static elements were coming at some point, too. Did I misunderstand that? If I didn't what is the current status? Right now, the Objective-C makes (inappropriate) use of function constants to make "class" methods appear in classes. Bill

3 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel