Pike-devel February 2024

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

4 participants
5 discussions

Re: Playing music using pike and SDL.
by Martin Nilsson (lvl 60) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Dec '25

03 Dec '25

Were you not able to get any C code to play through SDL either? Does your SDL library have a mixer compiled in it (I think it is optional)?

3 2

Re: Pure Pike annotations?
by Chris Angelico 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 23:39, Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum <10353(a)lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > > I'm trying to make good use of annotations, but all the existing ones > > are in cmod files, and I'm trying to work out how best to write them > > in Pike. My goal is to have an annotation that can be parameterized, > > something like this: > > > > class Anno(string label) { > > inherit Pike.Annotation; > > @constant; > > } > > > > @Anno("foobar"): > > void some_func() { } > > The above is supposed to work. > > > But while this does result in the annotation itself showing up, the > > label on that annotation doesn't. > > Try having the Anno class in a separate file. Ah yes, now it works. Thanks. Didn't think to try that. As long as Anno itself is added as a constant, the parameterized versions work correctly. > > What's the intended way to create parameterized annotations? > > This seems to be a compiler bug. Thanks. Not a major issue since there's a workaround (and I'll usually have them in separate files anyway). ChrisA

2 2

Pure Pike annotations?
by Chris Angelico 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

(Side note: This mailing list seems very dead lately. Is the LysKOM gateway down?) I'm trying to make good use of annotations, but all the existing ones are in cmod files, and I'm trying to work out how best to write them in Pike. My goal is to have an annotation that can be parameterized, something like this: class Anno(string label) { inherit Pike.Annotation; @constant; } @Anno("foobar"): void some_func() { } But while this does result in the annotation itself showing up, the label on that annotation doesn't. What's the intended way to create parameterized annotations? ChrisA

2 1

Re: pike docker images
by Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

Hi. At Pike Conference 2017 it was decided that we ought to hold a more informal meeting in Linköping ~ once every quarter. As the 3 month mark from the latest conference is coming up soon, it seems time to announce the first such meeting for 2024: Pike Meet-up 2024-Q1 Date: 2024-02-17 (Sat) Time: 10:00 - afternoon/evening Place: Roxen IS AB S:t Larsgatan 22A Linköping Welcome! /grubba

3 4

Debian Pike packaging and GTK2
by Chris Angelico 04 Feb '24

04 Feb '24

The latest releases of Debian don't include a pike8.0-gtk package any more. Apparently it's because it depends on old libraries: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885673 But all of those are optional dependencies. I just tested a fresh Debian 12 installation and was able to build Pike from source fairly easily. As long as libgtk2.0-dev is installed, the majority of the GTK2 module exists, and it's only GTK2.SourceView etc that are missing. How would we go about getting Pike GTK back into Debian? ChrisA

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel February 2024