Pike-devel July 2020

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

3 participants
7 discussions

Re: Playing music using pike and SDL.
by Martin Nilsson (lvl 60) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 03 Dec '25

03 Dec '25

Were you not able to get any C code to play through SDL either? Does your SDL library have a mixer compiled in it (I think it is optional)?

3 2

Pike Meet-up 2018-Q1
by Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 20 Oct '21

20 Oct '21

Hi. At Pike Conference 2017 it was decided that we ought to hold a more informal meeting in Linköping ~ once every quarter. As the three month mark from the conference is coming up soon, it seems time to announce the first such meeting for 2018: Pike Meet-up 2018-Q1 Date: 2018-02-03 (Sat) Time: 10:00 - afternoon/evening Place: Roxen IS AB S:t Larsgatan 22A Linköping Welcome! /grubba

2 13

Segmentation fault cause
by Stephen R. van den Berg 28 Aug '20

28 Aug '20

Running without these commits, it runs forever. Running with these commits results in segmentation faults every few minutes to hours (this is in heavy threaded/lock code: pgsql driver). I cannot offer a stacktrace yet. commit 4781e5e4fe034cc8b2acef468131d5dbc51ca21f Author: Henrik Grubbström (Grubba) <grubba(a)grubba.org> Date: Sun Jun 28 16:33:02 2020 +0200 Threads.Mutex: Added {try_,}shared_lock(). src/threads.c | 256 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 246 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) commit 35fa44331e70809a86a97a91bf80e27a38a6f35b Author: Henrik Grubbström (Grubba) <grubba(a)grubba.org> Date: Sat Jun 27 13:58:46 2020 +0200 Thread.Mutex: Keep track of pending locks. Mutex locks are now taken in the same order as the calls to lock(). This prevents potential starvation. src/threads.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) commit d461910bac03f0fddf714dff8794e73988d07ea6 Author: Henrik Grubbström (Grubba) <grubba(a)grubba.org> Date: Fri Jun 26 12:34:34 2020 +0200 Thread.Mutex: The key pointer is now to the storage (and not the object). src/threads.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) commit 37406b33d5670026537d4a9aca4776a88a94380b Author: Henrik Grubbström (Grubba) <grubba(a)grubba.org> Date: Thu Jun 25 15:37:42 2020 +0200 Build: Fixed some warnings. src/post_modules/GSSAPI/gssapi.cmod | 1 + src/post_modules/Nettle/hogweed.cmod | 1 + src/post_modules/SDL/SDL.cmod | 2 +- src/post_modules/ZXID/zxid.cmod | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) commit ea9a8260156eca36ceb1f555fd1c04c9f1c71685 Author: Henrik Grubbström (Grubba) <grubba(a)grubba.org> Date: Wed Jun 24 18:16:52 2020 +0200 Thread.MutexKey: Some preparations for having different kinds of keys. src/threads.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- Stephen.

3 30

Crypto.Password and Blowfish
by Stephen R. van den Berg 20 Jul '20

20 Jul '20

Has anyone attempted to add support for Blowfish encryption to Crypto.Password? I have some $2y$... prefixed passwords (interfacing with the PHP password_verify()) which I need to verify. -- Stephen.

4 11

Re: Operator assignment and strict_types
by Marc Simpson 08 Jul '20

08 Jul '20

Thanks! On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:00 AM Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum <10353(a)lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > Hi Marc. > > It took some time, but... > > > It looks like operator assignment (op=), increment and decrement > > statements aren't subjected to the same typechecks as their more > > explicit equivalents. > > Correct. > > > For example, neither the post-increment nor += statements below warn > > with strict_types enabled, even though they assign values outside of > > foo's restricted int domain: > > > > int(3..3) foo = 3; > > foo++; // no warning > > foo += 1; // no warning > > foo = foo + 1; // warning from strict_types > > > > Similarly, operator assignment on aggregates fails to elicit a warning: > [...] > > Fixed in Pike devel. > > The operator assignment expressions now warn in the same places as > their corresponding explict syntax does. > > The ++ and -- operators have not been modified (yet). > > > I'm guessing this is because the checks provided by the > > F_ASSIGN/F_ASSIGN_SELF case (las.c) only apply to direct assignment; > > op= and friends are presumably not instrumented for strict_types in > > the same manner. > > Correct. > > > Have there been any discussions around addressing this inconsistency? > > Now there has... > > /grubba

1 0

Operator assignment and strict_types
by Marc Simpson 07 Jul '20

07 Jul '20

Hi folks, It looks like operator assignment (op=), increment and decrement statements aren't subjected to the same typechecks as their more explicit equivalents. For example, neither the post-increment nor += statements below warn with strict_types enabled, even though they assign values outside of foo's restricted int domain: int(3..3) foo = 3; foo++; // no warning foo += 1; // no warning foo = foo + 1; // warning from strict_types Similarly, operator assignment on aggregates fails to elicit a warning: array(int) a = ({}); multiset(int) b = (<>); mapping(int:int) c = ([]); // no warnings a += ({ "hey" }); b += (< "hey" >); c += ([ "hey": "there" ]); // warnings from strict_types a = a + ({ "hey" }); b = b + (< "hey" >); c = c + ([ "hey": "there" ]); I'm guessing this is because the checks provided by the F_ASSIGN/F_ASSIGN_SELF case (las.c) only apply to direct assignment; op= and friends are presumably not instrumented for strict_types in the same manner. Have there been any discussions around addressing this inconsistency? Thanks, Marc

3 3

an automap bug
by Mateusz Krawczuk 06 Jul '20

06 Jul '20

Reproduces both on pike 8 from apt repository and pike compiled on master: $ ./pike -v Pike v8.1 release 13 Copyright © 1994-2018 Linköping University Pike comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; This is free software and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; read the files COPYING and COPYRIGHT in the Pike distribution for more details. $ $ cat automap1.pike int main() { write( "%O\n", combine_path("foo", ({ "abc", "cde" })[*] ) ); } $ $ cat automap2.pike int main() { string s = "foo"; write("%O\n", combine_path(s, ({ "abc", "cde" })[*] ) ); } $ $ ./pike automap1.pike ({ /* 2 elements */ "foo/abc", "foo/cde" }) $ $ ./pike automap2.pike automap2.pike:4:[*] not supported here. Pike: Failed to compile script. $ $ pike -v Pike v8.0 release 498 Copyright © 1994-2017 Linköping University Pike comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; This is free software and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; read the files COPYING and COPYRIGHT in the Pike distribution for more details. $ pike automap1.pike ({ /* 2 elements */ "foo/abc", "foo/cde" }) $ $ pike automap2.pike automap2.pike:4:[*] not supported here.

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel July 2020