Pike-devel July 2010

pike-devel@lists.lysator.liu.se

7 participants
19 discussions

AutoDoc
by Magnus Holmgren, Millnet/Lysator/Debian/Mensa ＠ Pike developers forum 30 Jul '10

30 Jul '10

I'm having a look at how the extracted documentation is built, because I think there's supposed to be some infrastructure for extracting and installing documentation from third-party modules built with the help of pike -x module, and I doubt that it will work the current packaging. IIUC, "make documentation" first uses extract_autodoc to create one XML file with documentation per source file (placed under the doc_build subdirectory of the build directory), then join_autodoc to create autodoc.… [View More]

1 0

Re: Debian packages
by Marc Dirix 29 Jul '10

29 Jul '10

> My plan for simplifying things while catering to various wishes is to > * remove pike7.8-full > * let pike7.8 Recommend all other packages. That way everything will > be installed if you run apt-get install pike7.8 unless you have > switched off automatic installation of recommended packages, but > it's still possible to opt out of individual packages. I have made a small set of patches which I'd like to be included in pike and debian packages in order to make the … [View More]

6 31

(no subject)
by Tor Edvardsson ＠ Pike developers forum 29 Jul '10

29 Jul '10

1 0

get_all_args and UNDEFINED
by Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS ＠ Pike developers forum 28 Jul '10

28 Jul '10

Yesterday I stumbled on a segfault: > allocate (17, UNDEFINED); Segmentation fault (core dumped) It's fixed now, but the problem is bigger than this particular case. The thing is that get_all_args doesn't always set the optional arguments - that happens both when the real arguments run out and when UNDEFINED is sent as a real argument. There's a lot of code that uses get_all_args and still looks at the arg counter to see whether an argument has been given. E.g. allocate() was like … [View More]

1 0

`+ optimizations
by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) ＠ Pike (-) developers forum 23 Jul '10

23 Jul '10

The following program ---8<--- class foo { string `+(mixed ... args) { return "left:"+sizeof(args); } string ``+(mixed ... args) { return "right:"+sizeof(args); } } int main() { foo x = foo(); write("%s\n%s\n%s\n", x+x+x+x+x, (((x+x)+x)+x)+x, x+(x+(x+(x+x)))); return 0; } ---8<--- gives the output left:4 left:4 left:1 (tested in Pike 7.8.350). Shouldn't the last line be "right:4"? We seem to be missing an opportunity for optimization here.

2 6

Ideas for better performance
by Jonas Walld�n ＠ Pike developers forum 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

I'd like to start a discussion on performance issues where I feel we can do a lot better with reasonable effort. My test case was initially the XSLT module in our CMS but with tools such as Shark (an OS X sampling profiler) I've encountered some interesting results that I've now reproduced in isolation. A fundamental observation is of course that CPUs and memory subsystems have different performance properties today compared to when core parts of Pike were written. One particular detail is the … [View More]frequent use of modulo (or rather int division) in hash tables which on x86_64 (if I recall correctly) has a latency in the 100+ cycle range. Examples of where this is used is mappings, identifier lookup, gc passes etc. A very naive replacement of %= in find_shared_string_identifier() (which typically scores high in an object-oriented test case like XSLT) improved benchmark runtime ~3-7% on my Core Duo laptop. My replacement was a very simple pointer shift/XOR mod 2^n. Next, enabling some additional Shark probes on misaligned memory writes together with the int div probe gave very weird results for code that I thought would be trivial. It turns out that this: void fn() { array arg = ({ 1, 2, 3 }); } ...copies arg recursively using a temporary mapping. Ouch! Consider a real-world example like the following: string quote_text(string txt, void|array from, void|array to) { from = from || ({ "<", ">", "&" }); to = to || ({ "<", ">", "&" }); return replace(txt, from, to); } ...which semantically uses the inlined arrays as constants if the caller doesn't pass from/to. In my mind this would just be a refcount bump but Grubba pointed out that arrays are not copy-on-write so that isn't currently possible. A similar test with mappings still passes copy_svalues_recursively_no_free so apparently the c-o-w property isn't taken advantage of there either. Adding c-o-w to arrays and using it in these situations would be really nice. I also found examples like the zeroing in real_allocate_array() where gcc (v4.2.1 in my case) generated quite lousy code. A rewrite to a pointer-based loop with item-chunked initialization was faster. Don't know if the compiler has to play safe with the repeated dereferencing of fields with unknown aliasing effects inside unions but I'll gladly help rewrite such code if people agree it's beneficial. Finally, anyone try compiling with Clang/llvm-gcc yet? I tested with llvm-gcc last year and aside from miscompilation in one place it was a tad slower overall compared to gcc. Maybe recent versions are better? Can we make a plan for action on these items or do we need the elusive 7.9 branch open first? [View Less]

13 58

FW: Sdl 100% cpu loading question
by Csürke Tamás 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

> From: linuxlinux1(a)windowslive.com > To: linuxlinux1(a)windowslive.com > Subject: Sdl 100% cpu loading question > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:39:43 +0200 > > Hi, i would like to ask how to prevent 100% cpu loading in sdl on windows? > > On linux it isn't problem because of the presense of the usleep function. > > or is there a similar way like the return -1 in gtk? > > Tamás > … [View More]

2 2

xcalloc optimization breaks testsuite
by Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS ＠ Pike developers forum 11 Jul '10

11 Jul '10

I now get this fatal in the testsuite (x86_64 with rtldebug): Doing tests in testsuite (11311 tests) Testing scoped variables 255:1... Testing scoped variables 256:1 expecting a compilation error... Testing scoped variables 16:17... Testing scoped variables 17:16... test 578, line 3250 Testing vtables and scope access. 1:2 2:6 3:20 4:73 5:280 6:1118 7:4590 8:19279 /home/mast/Pike/git/src/threads.c:515: Fatal error: exit_threads_disable() called too many times! Backtrace at time of … [View More]fatal: src/threads.c:2578: unknown function() testsuite:59: testsuite()->__class_313106_0_line_5()->thread_disabler() Aborted (core dumped) (gdb) bt #0 0x00002b524301ba75 in *__GI_raise (sig=<value optimized out>) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #1 0x00002b524301f5c0 in *__GI_abort () at abort.c:92 #2 0x0000000000571eed in debug_va_fatal ( fmt=0x984ce8 "exit_threads_disable() called too many times!\n", args=0x2b5246932c70) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/error.c:644 #3 0x0000000000571fb0 in debug_fatal ( fmt=0x984ce8 "exit_threads_disable() called too many times!\n") at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/error.c:651 #4 0x00000000006ea306 in exit_threads_disable (o=0x35219b0) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/threads.c:515 #5 0x0000000000687bd6 in compat_event_handler (e=1) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/program.c:3823 #6 0x000000000062cb85 in destruct_object (o=0x35219b0, reason=DESTRUCT_NO_REFS) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/object.c:869 #7 0x000000000062d90d in schedule_really_free_object (o=0x35219b0) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/object.c:1044 #8 0x00000000007514d4 in really_free_svalue (s=0x2b5246053030) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/svalue.c:129 #9 0x00000000004951c7 in eval_instruction_without_debug (pc=0x3434b03 "R\037\t\034\v\262") at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/interpret_functions.h:527 #10 0x00000000004a746e in eval_instruction (pc=0x3434acc "R\037\t\034\b\262") at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/interpret.c:1544 #11 0x00000000004b1014 in mega_apply (type=APPLY_STACK, args=1, arg1=0x0, arg2=0x0) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/interpret.c:2213 #12 0x00000000004b1299 in f_call_function (args=1) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/interpret.c:2266 #13 0x00000000006ec890 in new_thread_func (data=0x7fffe5589170) at /home/mast/Pike/git/src/threads.c:1111 #14 0x00002b5242b979ca in start_thread (arg=<value optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:300 #15 0x00002b52430ce6cd in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:112 #16 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () Git bisect pins it on: commit d4b72bd Author: Henrik Grubbström (Grubba) <grubba(a)grubba.org> Date: Thu Jul 1 11:25:18 2010 +0000 Allocate object storage with xcalloc() to reduce the amount of work for call_c_initializers(). [View Less]

2 1

SDL - 2 questions
by Csürke Tamás 05 Jul '10

05 Jul '10

Hi, I would like to ask 2 questions: 1. How can I rotate an image or surface in SDL? 2. How can I get the mouse position during mouse moving in SDL? Tamás _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Hatékony, ingyenes e-mail szolgáltatás a Microsoft által biztosított védelemmel. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pike-devel July 2010