Re: Test-implementation

nisse@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) wrote 30 Sep 2004 08:38:21 +0200:

| > Couldn't we support both, or even more? Popular formats, from widely | > distributed implementations, that we deem good enough could be defined | > as methods accepted in XHASHCASHCHALLENGE. | | We should keep the number of required methods to a minimum. | Otherwise, every implementation that wants to interoperate has to be | bloated by implementing a dozen different ways of doing essentially | the same thing. That's no good.

Right.

We could easily change the format but keep the rest of the existing implementation, I guess.

I found a Python implementation BTW. Slow of course, but nice for playing around with in our test implementation.