lyskomd-qa September 2003

lyskomd-qa@lists.lysator.liu.se

1 participants
6 discussions

[Bug 132] Cannot set absolute paths as defaults
by bugzilla-daemon＠cvs.lysator.liu.se 28 Sep '03

28 Sep '03

http://bugzilla.lysator.liu.se/show_bug.cgi?id=132 ------- Additional Comments From ceder(a)lysator.liu.se 2003-09-28 23:23 ------- I think DESTDIR is a better method of handling this. Since stow-1.3.2 was released in 1996, stow-1.3.3 in 2002, and no newer version exists, I don't think stow can be said to be a reliable source about where the GNU project is heading. I'm surprised that dh-make uses the \$${prefix} method. I believe it is an older way. Maybe it still works with more programs than the DESTDIR method. I'm not opening a new bug for this, unless a released version of automake, autoconf or the GNU coding standards starts advocating the \$${prefix} method. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 132] Cannot set absolute paths as defaults
by bugzilla-daemon＠cvs.lysator.liu.se 28 Sep '03

28 Sep '03

http://bugzilla.lysator.liu.se/show_bug.cgi?id=132 ------- Additional Comments From peterk(a)debian.org 2003-09-28 23:14 ------- dh-make creates such command lines for packages with configure scripts, and it works with most programs. I misrememebered, it was the GNU stow manual that recommended the make install prefix=something ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 132] Cannot set absolute paths as defaults
by bugzilla-daemon＠cvs.lysator.liu.se 28 Sep '03

28 Sep '03

http://bugzilla.lysator.liu.se/show_bug.cgi?id=132 ------- Additional Comments From ceder(a)lysator.liu.se 2003-09-28 22:43 ------- The docs for automake-1.7.7 advocates the DESTDIR method for doing staged installations, in *Note Install: (automake)Install. I have never seen the \$${prefix} method being advocated. Could you give me a pointer? By "autotools", I take it that you mean "automake, autoconf, libtools and the GNU coding standards". If you mean anything else, please point me in the right direction. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 132] Cannot set absolute paths as defaults
by bugzilla-daemon＠cvs.lysator.liu.se 28 Sep '03

28 Sep '03

http://bugzilla.lysator.liu.se/show_bug.cgi?id=132 ------- Additional Comments From peterk(a)debian.org 2003-09-28 20:48 ------- s/autotools stuff/autotools docs/ ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 132] Cannot set absolute paths as defaults
by bugzilla-daemon＠cvs.lysator.liu.se 28 Sep '03

28 Sep '03

http://bugzilla.lysator.liu.se/show_bug.cgi?id=132 ------- Additional Comments From peterk(a)debian.org 2003-09-28 20:46 ------- Sorry for not responding earlier: Yes, 2.1.x solves the problem, although it did introduce some problems wrt the the way I was installing the package to another directory than the final target directory (to fit it inside the Debian build structure). This is what I used in the 2.0.x packages: ./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/lyskom --exec-prefix=\$${prefix}/usr/lib/lyskom --mandir=\$${prefix}/usr/share/man --infodir=\$${prefix}/usr/share/info --sysconfdir=\$${prefix}/etc/lyskom-server and $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/lyskom-server This combination made the paths.h go all wacko. For 2.1.x, I instead use this combination: ./configure --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc/lyskom-server --localstatedir=/var/lib/lyskom-server and DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/lyskom-server $(MAKE) install which seems to work fine. You may want to review this, since the autotools stuff seem to prefer the first variant. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 1120] Don't log "Slow DNS" during the initial rush
by bugzilla-daemon＠cvs.lysator.liu.se 21 Sep '03

21 Sep '03

http://bugzilla.lysator.liu.se/show_bug.cgi?id=1120 ceder(a)lysator.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|--- |2.1.3 ------- Additional Comments From ceder(a)lysator.liu.se 2003-09-21 11:56 ------- Maybe we simply allow the clients to do too much work at once, so that the select loop runs too seldom. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

lyskomd-qa September 2003