fsh-bugs

fsh-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se

3967 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[fsh-bugs] how r u?
by Laverne Rudy 03 Jul '04

03 Jul '04

this thus principal around finally sincerely two when on sort blow saw where

1 0

[fsh-bugs] Email marketing
by wesz＠hotmail.com 02 Jul '04

02 Jul '04

1 0

[fsh-bugs] hello Miplm Bgmygiiji Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:13:23 AM 0000
by Bxjrqleokb Ehh 01 Jul '04

01 Jul '04

9923k48 6s7 i42i2 0p32859 23x 7i6j232011 8619449 4722 1290J3 6a7842c1 8t 5e8702 0614 pu9 849439971 736H4 50J992238 584s1873G 7a76i8 9077 976 03u6809 74m042205 5y8m655402 P9 t457 6743693d28 2c281 p61 791ie F41 m9 313334 7965 v69448405 337 22R705q 41674 pij58 u97sg8 3210698 06gmM91ik5 b09 3m382d3f 1h99D9 76x81 1856662 5398709 097 7283926 2058430 953209969 20 012860 79226193 psa5co Q5 g914379 61580 10163 t3807qU515 1602t523 158061 503Dp013 76 i078 277M87 04228583o Bkobcxt Qmfkwutnrnaa. Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:13:23 AM 0000

1 0

[fsh-bugs] WORLDWIDE DELIVER POPULAR SOFTWARES FROM 15 DO1LAR EACH worrying groschen
by Tobi Reynalda 29 Jun '04

29 Jun '04

debonnaire offset throned seemingly paddock mynah cline cloche ceresin numb clog satyr cerastium python structured

1 0

[fsh-bugs] Email marketing
by qewe＠hotmail.com 27 Jun '04

27 Jun '04

1 0

[fsh-bugs] WE SHIIP WORLDWIDE ORIGINAL SOFTWARES AT CHEAP throes subshrub
by Maryam Izola 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

sidebar ascomycete aback dermal parlormaid slurred brama guar tenpenny millinery reefs razz

1 0

[fsh-bugs] T0p Quality S0ftware at the L0west Possible Priice from Pate's S0ftSh0p
by Leonel Boyd 24 Jun '04

24 Jun '04

If you've enjoyed a little and endured a lot, you've really done pretty well. There are perhaps no days of our childhood we lived so fully as those we spent with a favorite book. Unless a capacity for thinking be accompanied by a capacity for action, a superior mind exists in torture. One can advise comfortably from a safe port. To buy books would be a good thing if we also could buy the time to read them. Don't mistake activity for achievement. To grasp the full significance of life is the actor's duty, to interpret it is his problem, and to express it his dedication. One can advise comfortably from a safe port. There has never yet been a man in our history who led a life of ease whose name is worth remembering. Great things are not done by impulse, but by a series of small things brought together. A good many dramatic situations begin with screaming. The most important part of education is proper training in the nursery. Let us move from the era of confrontation to the era of negotiation. But their intervention makes our acts to serve ever less merely the immediate claims of our instincts.

1 0

[fsh-bugs] THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE
by Boll 23 Jun '04

23 Jun '04

Please reply to hdgbyi(a)public.guangzhou.gd.cn, thank you! THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE By re-analysing Heisenberg's Gamma-Ray Microscope experiment and the ideal experiment from which the uncertainty principle is derived, it is actually found that the uncertainty principle can not be obtained from them. It is therefore found to be untenable. Key words: uncertainty principle; Heisenberg's Gamma-Ray Microscope Experiment; ideal experiment Ideal Experiment 1 Heisenberg's Gamma-Ray Microscope Experiment A free electron sits directly beneath the center of the microscope's lens (please see AIP page http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p08b.htm or diagram below) . The circular lens forms a cone of angle 2A from the electron. The electron is then illuminated from the left by gamma rays--high energy light which has the shortest wavelength. These yield the highest resolution, for according to a principle of wave optics, the microscope can resolve (that is, "see" or distinguish) objects to a size of dx, which is related to and to the wavelength L of the gamma ray, by the expression: dx = L/(2sinA) (1) However, in quantum mechanics, where a light wave can act like a particle, a gamma ray striking an electron gives it a kick. At the moment the light is diffracted by the electron into the microscope lens, the electron is thrust to the right. To be observed by the microscope, the gamma ray must be scattered into any angle within the cone of angle 2A. In quantum mechanics, the gamma ray carries momentum as if it were a particle. The total momentum p is related to the wavelength by the formula, p = h / L, where h is Planck's constant. (2) In the extreme case of diffraction of the gamma ray to the right edge of the lens, the total momentum would be the sum of the electron's momentum P'x in the x direction and the gamma ray's momentum in the x direction: P' x + (h sinA) / L', where L' is the wavelength of the deflected gamma ray. In the other extreme, the observed gamma ray recoils backward, just hitting the left edge of the lens. In this case, the total momentum in the x direction is: P''x - (h sinA) / L''. The final x momentum in each case must equal the initial x momentum, since momentum is conserved. Therefore, the final x momenta are equal to each other: P'x + (h sinA) / L' = P''x - (h sinA) / L'' (3) If A is small, then the wavelengths are approximately the same, L' ~ L" ~ L. So we have P''x - P'x = dPx ~ 2h sinA / L (4) Since dx = L/(2 sinA), we obtain a reciprocal relationship between the minimum uncertainty in the measured position, dx, of the electron along the x axis and the uncertainty in its momentum, dPx, in the x direction: dPx ~ h / dx or dPx dx ~ h. (5) For more than minimum uncertainty, the "greater than" sign may added. Except for the factor of 4pi and an equal sign, this is Heisenberg's uncertainty relation for the simultaneous measurement of the position and momentum of an object. Re-analysis To be seen by the microscope, the gamma ray must be scattered into any angle within the cone of angle 2A. The microscope can resolve (that is, "see" or distinguish) objects to a size of dx, which is related to and to the wavelength L of the gamma ray, by the expression: dx = L/(2sinA) (1) This is the resolving limit of the microscope and it is the uncertain quantity of the object's position. The microscope can not see the object whose size is smaller than its resolving limit, dx. Therefore, to be seen by the microscope, the size of the electron must be larger than or equal to the resolving limit. But if the size of the electron is larger than or equal to the resolving limit dx, the electron will not be in the range dx. Therefore, dx can not be deemed to be the uncertain quantity of the electron's position which can be seen by the microscope, but deemed to be the uncertain quantity of the electron's position which can not be seen by the microscope. To repeat, dx is uncertainty in the electron's position which can not be seen by the microscope. To be seen by the microscope, the gamma ray must be scattered into any angle within the cone of angle 2A, so we can measure the momentum of the electron. dPx is the uncertainty in the electron's momentum which can be seen by microscope. What relates to dx is the electron where the size is smaller than the resolving limit. When the electron is in the range dx, it can not be seen by the microscope, so its position is uncertain. What relates to dPx is the electron where the size is larger than or equal to the resolving limit .The electron is not in the range dx, so it can be seen by the microscope and its position is certain. Therefore, the electron which relates to dx and dPx respectively is not the same. What we can see is the electron where the size is larger than or equal to the resolving limit dx and has a certain position, dx = 0. Quantum mechanics does not rely on the size of the object, but on Heisenberg's Gamma-Ray Microscope experiment. The use of the microscope must relate to the size of the object. The size of the object which can be seen by the microscope must be larger than or equal to the resolving limit dx of the microscope, thus the uncertain quantity of the electron's position does not exist. The gamma ray which is diffracted by the electron can be scattered into any angle within the cone of angle 2A, where we can measure the momentum of the electron. What we can see is the electron which has a certain position, dx = 0, so that in no other position can we measure the momentum of the electron. In Quantum mechanics, the momentum of the electron can be measured accurately when we measure the momentum of the electron only, therefore, we have gained dPx = 0. And, dPx dx =0. (6) Every physical principle is based on an Ideal Experiment, not based on MATHEMATICS, including heisenberg uncertainty principle. For example, the Law of Conservation of Momentum is based on the collision of two stretch ball in the vacuum; the Principle of equivalence(general relativity) is besed on the Einstein's laboratory in the lift. Einstein said, One Experiment is enough to negate a physical principle. Heisenberg's Gamma-Ray Microscope experiment has negated the uncertainty principle. Ideal experiment 2 Single Slit Diffraction Experiment Suppose a particle moves in the Y direction originally and then passes a slit with width dx(Please see diagram below) . The uncertain quantity of the particle's position in the X direction is dx, and interference occurs at the back slit . According to Wave Optics , the angle where No.1 min of interference pattern is can be calculated by following formula: sinA=L/2dx (1) and L=h/p where h is Planck's constant. (2) So the uncertainty principle can be obtained dPx dx ~ h (5) Re-analysis According to Newton first law , if an external force in the X direction does not affect the particle, it will move in a uniform straight line, ( Motion State or Static State) , and the motion in the Y direction is unchanged .Therefore , we can learn its position in the slit from its starting point. The particle can have a certain position in the slit and the uncertain quantity of the position is dx =0. According to Newton first law , if the external force at the X direction does not affect particle, and the original motion in the Y direction is not changed , the momentum of the particle int the X direction will be Px=0 and the uncertain quantity of the momentum will be dPx =0. This gives: dPx dx =0. (6) No experiment negates NEWTON FIRST LAW. Whether in quantum mechanics or classical mechanics, it applies to the microcosmic world and is of the form of the Energy-Momentum conservation laws. If an external force does not affect the particle and it does not remain static or in uniform motion, it has disobeyed the Energy-Momentum conservation laws. Under the above ideal experiment , it is considered that the width of the slit is the uncertain quantity of the particle's position. But there is certainly no reason for us to consider that the particle in the above experiment has an uncertain position, and no reason for us to consider that the slit's width is the uncertain quantity of the particle. Therefore, the uncertainty principle, dPx dx ~ h (5) which is derived from the above experiment is unreasonable. Conclusion

1 0

[fsh-bugs] THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE
by Boll 23 Jun '04

23 Jun '04

1 0

[fsh-bugs] Last 2 Days For Software Bargain whether
by Moriah Lauretta 22 Jun '04

22 Jun '04

allow different somewhat picture mean make fly control high

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

fsh-bugs