On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Patrick Feisthammel wrote:
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 07:52:43 +0100 From: Patrick Feisthammel pafei@rubin.ch To: Jorgen Cederlof jc@lysator.liu.se Cc: wotsap-updates@lists.lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [Wotsap-updates] Hickup in the updates Sender: wotsap-updates-bounces@lists.lysator.liu.se
ok, i will generate a wot-signature key to sign them.
| + Much easier debugging. | + Spam filters won't affect the updates. | + The redundancy of storing | + If they are PGP signed, other people can retreive them directly from | you.
I agree on all points
Just a thought:
If you ever want to change the repository/name scheme
from 2005-02-07.wot to 2005/02/07.wot or 2005/02/2005-02-07.wot
maybe now is a good time.
HPP
---------------------------------------------------------------- _ Henk P. Penning, Computer Systems Group R Uithof CGN-A232 _/ _ Dept of Computer Science, Utrecht University T +31 30 253 4106 / _/ \ Padualaan 14, 3584CH Utrecht, the Netherlands F +31 30 251 3791 _/ _/ http://www.cs.uu.nl/staff/henkp.html M penning@cs.uu.nl _/