I actually prefer destroy because it makes more sense grammatically, to go along with create.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Chris Angelico<rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike(-) developers forum <10353@lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote:> Note that AFAIK destruct() in some GTK2 classes is a public function> (and thus part of the API).Do you mean destroy? It got renamed in the big _destruct rename, andit was because I'd been using it that I started poking around andfinding this. But I'm quite okay with the API being "destruct(obj)"rather than "obj->destroy()", as long as it works reliably.ChrisA