nmav at gnutls.org
Fri Apr 15 21:50:34 CEST 2011
On 04/15/2011 09:13 PM, Niels Möller wrote:
> I've now reverted this old change, which means that from now on serpent
> in Nettle ought to agree with other implementations. And this naturally
> also breaks compatibility for anyone using the serpent implementation of
> all (or almost all) earlier versions of Nettle.
Would this mean that nettle is now compatible with the libgcrypt version
of serpent? In that case would the LGPL libgcrypt code be used instead?
More information about the nettle-bugs